A Systematic Review of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
el-bilek Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders 2016 · PMID 27429562
The aim of this study was to systematically review dextrose (d-glucose) prolotherapy efficacy in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Electronic databases PubMed, Healthline, OmniMedicalSearch, Medscape, and EMBASE were searched from 1990 to January 2016. Prospectively designed studies that used dextrose as the sole active prolotherapy constituent were selected. Two independent reviewers rated studies for quality of evidence using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database assessment scale for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Downs and Black evaluation tool for non-RCTs, for level of evidence using a modified Sackett scale, and for clinically relevant pain score difference using minimal clinically important change criteria. Study population, methods, and results data were extracted and tabulated. Fourteen RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 18 case series studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Pain conditions were clustered into tendinopathies, osteoarthritis (OA), spinal/pelvic, and myofascial pain. The RCTs were high-quality Level 1 evidence (Physiotherapy Evidence Database ≥8) and found dextrose injection superior to controls in Osgood-Schlatter disease, lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, traumatic rotator cuff injury, knee OA, finger OA, and myofascial pain; in biomechanical but not subjective measures in temporal mandibular joint; and comparable in a short-term RCT but superior in a long-term RCT in low back pain. Many observational studies were of high quality and reported consistent positive evidence in multiple studies of tendinopathies, knee OA, sacroiliac pain, and iliac crest pain that received RCT confirmation in separate studies. Eighteen studies combined patient self-rating (subjective) with psychometric, imaging, and/or biomechanical (objective) outcome measurement and found both positive subjective and objective outcomes in 16 studies and positive objective but not subjective outcomes in two studies. All 15 studies solely using subjective or psychometric measures reported positive findings. Use of dextrose prolotherapy is supported for treatment of tendinopathies, knee and finger joint OA, and spinal/pelvic pain due to ligament dysfunction. Efficacy in acute pain, as first-line therapy, and in myofascial pain cannot be determined from the literature.
bu makaleden üretilen sorular (4)
el-bilek orta
Dekstroz proloterapisi icin konsantrasyon secimini planliyorsunuz.
Sistematik derlemelere gore dekstroz proloterapisinde kullanilan konsantrasyon araligi nedir?
cevabı gör
doğru cevap: %5 ile %50 arasi
açıklama: Sistematik derlemeler dekstroz konsantrasyonlarinin %5 ile %50 arasinda genis bir aralikta kullanildigini vurgulamistir.
Hauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. 2016, Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 9:139-159 PMID 27429562
el-bilek orta
Ele ozgu dekstroz proloterapisinde tipik konsantrasyon secimini belirliyorsunuz.
Genel araligin %5-50 oldugu belirtilirken ele ozgu tipik dekstroz konsantrasyonu hangi araliktadir?
cevabı gör
doğru cevap: %10-20
açıklama: Genel aralik %5-50 olmakla birlikte ele ozgu tipik konsantrasyon %10-20 olarak belirtilmistir.
Hauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. 2016, Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 9:139-159 PMID 27429562
el-bilek zor
Dekstroz proloterapisi calismalarini karsilastirirken kisitliliklari degerlendiriyorsunuz.
Sistematik derlemelere gore dekstroz proloterapisi calismalarinin karsilastirilmasini zorlastiran temel sorun nedir?
cevabı gör
doğru cevap: Teknik, volum ve ek girisimlerde standardizasyon eksikligi
açıklama: Derlemeler teknik, volum ve ek girisimlerdeki standardizasyon eksikliginin karsilastirmayi zorlastirdigini vurgulamistir.
Hauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. 2016, Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 9:139-159 PMID 27429562
el-bilek kolay
Dekstroz konsantrasyon araligini bildiren kaynagin turunu belirtiyorsunuz.
Dekstroz konsantrasyon araligini (%5-50) ve standardizasyon eksikligini bildiren kanit turu nedir?
cevabı gör
doğru cevap: Sistematik derleme
açıklama: Bu bilgi bir sistematik derlemeden gelmekte olup dekstroz konsantrasyonlarinin %5-50 araliginda kullanildigini vurgular.
Hauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. 2016, Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 9:139-159 PMID 27429562
tüm makaleler ve soru çözme →